Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Modified Drinking Water Quality Index (Dwqi) for Assessing Drinking Source Water Quality in Rural Communities of Khuzestan Province, Iran Publisher



Abtahi M1 ; Golchinpour N2 ; Yaghmaeian K2 ; Rafiee M3 ; Jahangirirad M4 ; Keyani A5 ; Saeedi R6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Khuzestan Rural Water and Wastewater Company, Ahvaz, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Ecological Indicators Published:2015


Abstract

We reconsidered the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) to achieve an efficient drinking water quality index (DWQI) for assessment of drinking source water quality in rural communities of Khuzestan Province, Iran in 2009-2013. In contribution with a panel of water quality experts, the CCME WQI was mainly modified by four changes: (1 and 2) assigning weight factors for input parameters and index factors, (3) modifying excursion concept for carcinogens and bioaccumulative pollutants and (4) removing effect of unequal measurements of input parameters. The DWQI characterizes the drinking source water quality through comparing the measured values of input parameters with relevant benchmarks. The DWQI score (from 0 to 100) classifies the water quality in five categories as poor (0-54.9), marginal (55.0-69.9), fair (70.0-84.9), good (85.0-94.9) and excellent (95.0-100). Based on the DWQI, the temporal changes of the rural drinking source water quality were not significant; while the spatial variations of the water quality were considerable across the province, so the DWQI scores in the northern counties were higher than that in the southern ones. At the county level, the highest and lowest average scores of the DWQI (±standard deviation: SD) were observed in Izeh and Shadegan to be 90 ± 5 and 69 ± 10, respectively. Based on the DWQI, proportions of the drinking water sources with the excellent, good, fair, marginal and poor qualities were determined to be 6.7, 59.1, 26.2, 7.8 and 0.1%, respectively. Turbidity and Ryznar Index (RI) were introduced respectively as the health-based and esthetic parameters with the most violations (22.7 and 63.2%, respectively). The results of the case study and sensitivity analysis indicated that the DWQI is a simple, flexible, stable and reliable index and could be used as an effective tool to characterize drinking source water quality. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
21. Hydrogen Sulfide Concentrations in Indoor Air of Thermal Springs, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (2018)