Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Sildenafil Vs. Tadalafil for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Single-Arm Self-Controlled Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Zahir M1, 2 ; Samzadeh M2 ; Poopak A3 ; Khoshdel AR4 ; Armin A2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Urology, Islamic Azad University of Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Islamic Azad University of Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Urology Journal Published:2023


Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and adverse events of sildenafil monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with its FDA-approved counterpart, tadalafil. Materials and Methods: In this single-arm self-controlled clinical trial, 33 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent a 6-week treatment with sildenafil, followed by a 4-week washout period and finally a 6-week treatment with tadalafil. Patients were examined on each appointment and post-void residual (PVR) urine, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of life index (IPSS-QoL index) were recorded subsequently. Efficacy of each drug regimen was then evaluated by comparing these outcome parameters. Results: Both sildenafil and tadalafil were shown to improve PVR (both p <.001), IPSS (both p <.001) and IPSS-QoL index (both p <.001) significantly. Sildenafil was more effective than tadalafil in reducing PVR (mean difference (95%CI) = 9.91% (4.11, 15.72), p <.001) and ameliorating IPSS-QoL index (mean difference (95%CI) = 19.3% (4.47, 34.41), p =.027). Moreover, although not significant, sildenafil reduced IPSS more than tadalafil (mean difference (95%CI) = 3.33% (-0.22, 6.87), p =.065). Concurrent erectile dysfunction did not affect responsiveness to therapy with either sildenafil or tadalafil but age was inversely related to post-treatment IPSS in both sildenafil (B = 0.21 (0.04, 0.37), p =.015) and tadalafil (B = 0.14 (0.02, 0.26), p =.021) regimens with a more prominent role in responsiveness to sildenafil (β = 0.31) compared to tadalafil (β = 0.19). Conclusion: Considering the significantly better improvement of PVR and IPSS-Qol index with sildenafil, this drug can be nominated as a suitable alternative for tadalafil as a BPH treatment, especially in younger patients who don’t have any contraindications. © 2023, Urology and Nephrology Research Centre. All Rights Reserved.