Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Short-Duration Dynamic Fdg Pet Imaging: Optimization and Clinical Application Publisher Pubmed



Samimi R1 ; Kamaliasl A1 ; Geramifar P2 ; Van Den Hoff J3, 4 ; Rahmim A5, 6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Medical Radiation Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, 01328, Germany
  4. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, 01307, Germany
  5. 5. Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  6. 6. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

Source: Physica Medica Published:2020


Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether short dynamic PET imaging started at injection, complemented with routine clinical acquisition at 60-min post-injection (static), can achieve reliable kinetic analysis. Methods: Dynamic and static 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET data were generated using realistic simulations to assess uncertainties due to statistical noise as well as bias. Following image reconstructions, kinetic parameters obtained from a 2-tissue-compartmental model (2TCM) were estimated, making use of the static image, and the time duration of dynamic PET data were incrementally shortened. We also investigated, in the first 2-min, different frame sampling rates, towards optimized dynamic PET imaging. Kinetic parameters from shortened dynamic datasets were additionally estimated for 9 patients (15 scans) with liver metastases of colorectal cancer, and were compared with those derived from full dynamic imaging using correlation and Passing–Bablok regression analyses. Results: The results showed that by reduction of dynamic scan times from 60-min to as short as 5-min, while using static data at 60-min post-injection, bias and variability stayed comparable in estimated kinetic parameters. Early frame samplings of 5, 24 and 30 s yielded highest biases compared to other schemes. An early frame sampling of 10 s generally kept both bias and variability to a minimum. In clinical studies, strong correlation (r ≥ 0.97, P < 0.0001) existed between all kinetic parameters in full vs. shortened scan protocols. Conclusions: Shortened 5-min dynamic scan, sampled as 12 × 10 + 6 × 30 s, followed by 3-min static image at 60-min post-injection, enables accurate and robust estimation of 2TCM parameters, while enabling generation of SUV estimates. © 2020