Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparison of Different Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Fnas and Missed Malignancies Publisher



Seif E1 ; Qorbani M2, 3 ; Mousavi S1 ; Salahshoor A4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
  2. 2. Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
  3. 3. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Radiology Department, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

Source: Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography Published:2022


Abstract

Objective: The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) has been proposed to reduce the number of unnecessary fine needle aspirations (FNA) from thyroid nodules. Materials and Methods: An individual radiologist provided sonographic examinations and FNA on a collection of 188 thyroid nodules. The recommendations based on the TIRADS system, for each nodule, was determined and evaluated against the cytology results. Results: The American College of Radiology (ACR), artificial intelligence (AI), European (EU), and Korean (K) scoring systems reduced FNAs by 53%, 56%, 48%, and 28%, respectively. Among those lesions without a recommendation for immediate FNA, The ACR would have missed four malignant nodules, the AI would have missed four malignant nodules, and K TIRADS would have missed three malignant nodules but with a recommended follow-up imaging. The ACR would have missed three malignant nodules, the AI would have missed four malignant nodules, and EU TIRADS would have missed four malignant nodules, without a recommended follow-up examination. The highest and lowest kappa interrelated agreements were between ACR and AI (0.902) and AI and K (0.448). Conclusion: The ACR and AI TIRADS could substantially decrease the number of FNAs but rely on follow-up imaging. The EU TIRADS reduced the number of FNAs, the least however this system had less dependence on follow-up imaging. The K TIRADS was the most conservative method and the least dependent on follow-up diagnostics. © The Author(s) 2021.