Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Student's Empowerment Program on Brucellosis Prevention: An Application of Extended Health Belief Model Publisher Pubmed



Karimyan K1, 2 ; Khezeli M3 ; Latifi A4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Environmental Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
  2. 2. Environmental Health Engineering Department, Public Health School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Public Health, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran

Source: Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene Published:2020


Abstract

Background. To determine the effect of student's empowerment program using the extended health belief model on the brucellosis prevention in rural high school in Divandarreh, Kurdistan province, Iran. Materials and methods. Quasi-experimental study with repeated measure (pre-test, post-test and at 2-month follow-up). In all 220 rural high school students were selected using a cluster sampling method. The data collection tool was a questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model (HBM). Five 1.5 hours sessions using lecture, group discussion, inquiry method, leaflet delivery, and the use of slides with Overhead projector and PowerPoints slide show, designed according to the Systematic Comprehensive Health Education and Promotion Model (SHEP), was presented for intervention group twice a week in schools. Data were analyzed by SPSS 18, using descriptive statistics as well as Chi-square, independent t-test and repeated measures at a significant level less than 0.05. Results. The total mean age of participants was 14.6 ± 2.3. The intervention and control groups had no significant differences in terms of age, gender, and other demographic variables. There was no significant differences in the intervention and control groups before the intervention in terms of awareness, severity, benefits, barriers and self-efficacy. After educational program scores of awareness, severity, susceptibility, benefits, barriers and selfefficacy, and performance were higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. Conclusion. Overall, implementation of the educational intervention based on theories and models had good effects on people that are in the risk of infection and zoonotic disease. Copyright © 2019 by Pacini Editore Srl, Pisa, Italy.