Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Amantadine Hydrochloride for Evaluating the Functional Improvement of Patients Following Severe Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Publisher Pubmed



Shimia M1 ; Iranmehr A2 ; Valizadeh A2 ; Mirzaei F2 ; Namvar M2 ; Rafiei E1 ; Rahimi A1 ; Khadivi A2 ; Aeinfar K2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences Published:2023


Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considering the known derangements in the dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems following traumatic brain injury (TBI), dopamine agonists are used as a pharmacologic option. In this study, we evaluate the effects of amantadine hydrochloride on the functional improvement of severe TBI patients. METHODS: Within a triple-blinded (patients, intervention administrators, and outcome assessors) placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the effects of amantadine (100 mg BD (twice a day) for 14 days, then 150 mg BD for another 7 days, and 200 mg BD for another 21 days) on outcome measurements of weekly mean Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS), through six weeks of trial for 57 patients (29 amantadine, 28 placeboes) with severe TBI admitted in our hospital. RESULTS: Although both groups had improvement in their DRS, the change from baseline was significantly better in the amantadine group (10.88±5.24 for amantadine vs. 8.04±4.07 for placebo, P=0.015). No significant difference was observed between groups for GOS (1.04±0.55 for amantadine vs. 1.12±1.05 for placebo, P=0.966). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, amantadine hydrochloride might improve the speed of functional ability improvement in severe TBI patients, evaluated by DRS, and is also well tolerated by patients. Although, there were some limitations in this study, including small sample size, short time interval, not providing a wash-off period and invalidity of GOS for measuring recovery rates in short-term periods. © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.