Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
How Much Should You Worry About Contaminant Neutrons in Spatially Fractionated Grid Radiation Therapy? Publisher Pubmed



Mahmoudi F1 ; Mohammadi N2 ; Haghighi M3 ; Alirezaei Z4 ; Jabbari I5 ; Chegeni N6 ; Elmtalab S7 ; Vegacarrillo HR8 ; Kazemian A9 ; Geraily G7, 9 ; Karimi AH7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Razi Herbal Medicines Research Center, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
  3. 3. Neuroimaging and Analysis Group, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. School of Paramedicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Physics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Academic Unit of Nuclear Studies, University Autonomous of Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico
  9. 9. Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: PLoS ONE Published:2023


Abstract

Neutron contamination in radiation therapy is of concern in treatment with high-energy photons (> 10 MV). With the development of new radiotherapy modalities such as spatially fractionated grid radiation therapy (SFGRT) or briefly grid radiotherapy, more studies are required to evaluate the risks associated with neutron contamination. In 15 MV SFGRT, high- Z materials such as lead and cerrobend are used as the block on the tray of linear accelerator (linac) which can probably increase the photoneutron production. On the other hand, the high-dose fractions (10-20 Gy) used in SFGRT can induce high neutron contamination. The current study was devoted to addressing these concerns via compression of neutron fluence (Φn) and ambient dose equivalent (H*n 10 ) at the patient table and inside the maze between SFGRT and conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT). The main components of the 15 MV Siemens Primus equipped with different grids and located inside a typical radiotherapy bunker were simulated by the MCNPX® Monte Carlo code. Evidence showed that the material used for grid construction does not significantly increase neutron contamination inside the maze. However, at the end of the maze, neutron contamination in SFGRT is significantly higher than in CFRT. In this regard, a delay time of 15 minutes after SFGRT is recommended for all radiotherapy staff before entering the maze. It can be also concluded that H*n 10 at the patient table is at least 10 times more pronounced than inside the maze. Therefore, the patient is more at risk of neutrons compared to the staff. The H*n 10 at the isocenter in SFGRT with grids made of lead and cerrobend was nearly equal to CFRT. Nevertheless, it was dramatically lower than in CFRT by 30% if the brass grid is used. Accordingly, SFGRT with the brass grid is recommended, from radiation protection aspects. © 2023 Mahmoudi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.