Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy in the Management of Skull Base Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Javadnia P1 ; Bahadori AR2, 3 ; Ghanaatpisheh A4 ; Dahaghin S5 ; Rajabi M6 ; Davari A2, 7 ; Sheikhvatan M8, 9 ; Ranji S2 ; Shafiee S10 ; Tafakhori A2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  4. 4. Student Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
  5. 5. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. School of Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
  7. 7. Medical colleges, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Medical Biology and Genetics Department, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
  9. 9. Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, United States
  10. 10. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgeon, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Source: Neurosurgical Review Published:2025


Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) have gained prominence as both adjuvant and primary treatment options for patients with skull base tumors that are either inoperable or present as residual or recurrent lesions post-surgery. The object of the current study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted SRS and SRT across various skull base pathologies. The study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines and involved a comprehensive evaluation of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web-of-Science, and the Cochrane Library. The data collection period was extended up to 30 September. Statistical analyses were executed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Furthermore, Cochran’s Q test assessed statistical heterogeneity within the findings. From an initial pool of 1,792 articles, 69 studies were included in the systematic review, with 60 qualifying for meta-analysis, encompassing 3,046 participants. Meta-analysis revealed tumor control rates were significantly enhanced with the use of CyberKnife (95% CI: 0.901–0.928, p < 0.001) and robotic Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) (95% CI: 0.897–0.959, p < 0.001). Meningiomas and schwannomas exhibited higher treatment responsiveness (ES: 0.960 and 0.949, respectively), whereas chordomas displayed lower responsiveness (ES: 0.743). The overall major adverse event rate was between 5.6% and 8.3% (95% CI: 0.056–0.083, p < 0.001). Adverse events exhibited a higher incidence in patients with adenomas (95% CI: 0.122–0.217, p < 0.001), while they were least prevalent in those with schwannomas (95% CI: 0.019–0.041, p < 0.001). Robotic SRS and SRT, employing both gamma-knife and cyber-knife, have demonstrated promising outcomes characterized by high efficacy and safety in managing various skull base tumors. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
13. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Lavender on Cancer Complications, Complementary Therapies in Medicine (2022)