Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
An Update on the Role of Mpmri and 68Ga-Psma Pet Imaging in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer Publisher Pubmed



Bagheri H1 ; Mahdavi SR2 ; Geramifar P3 ; Neshastehriz A1 ; Sajadi Rad M1 ; Dadgar H4 ; Arabi H5 ; Zaidi H5, 6, 7, 8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Radiation Biology Research Center and Department of Medical Physics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Imam Reza research Center, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging department, RAZAVI Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
  5. 5. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  6. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University 6Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  7. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  8. 8. University Research and Innovation Center, Obuda University, Budapest, Hungary

Source: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Published:2024


Abstract

The objective of this work was to review comparisons of the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (prostate-specific membrane antigen) PET/CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer among patients undergoing initial staging prior to radical prostatectomy or experiencing recurrent prostate cancer, based on histopathological data. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science, and relevant articles were analyzed with various parameters, including year of publication, study design, patient count, age, PSA (prostate-specific antigen) value, Gleason score, standardized uptake value (SUVmax), detection rate, treatment history, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and PI-RADS (prostate imaging reporting and data system) scores. Only studies directly comparing PSMA-PET and mpMRI were considered, while those examining combined accuracy or focusing on either modality alone were excluded. In total, 24 studies comprising 1717 patients were analyzed, with the most common indication for screening being staging, followed by relapse. The findings indicated that 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT effectively diagnosed prostate cancer in patients with suspected or confirmed disease, and both methods exhibited comparable efficacy in identifying lesion-specific information. However, notable heterogeneity was observed, highlighting the necessity for standardization of imaging and histopathology systems to mitigate inter-study variability. Future research should prioritize evaluating the combined diagnostic performance of both modalities to enhance sensitivity and reduce unnecessary biopsies. Overall, the utilization of PSMA-PET and mpMRI in combination holds substantial potential for significantly advancing the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. © 2024 The Author(s)
Other Related Docs
14. Molecular Imaging of Bone Metastases Using Tumor-Targeted Tracers, Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2019)