Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Novel Laryngeal Palpatory Scale (Lps) in Patients With Muscle Tension Dysphonia Publisher Pubmed



Jafari N1 ; Salehi A1 ; Meerschman I2 ; Izadi F4 ; Ebadi A5 ; Talebian S6 ; Khoddami SM7 ; Dabirmoghadam P8 ; Drinnan M9 ; Jordens K10 ; Dhaeseleer E2 ; Van Lierde K2, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  3. 3. Department of Speech-Language Therapy and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
  4. 4. ENT and Head and Neck Research Center and Department, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Otolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
  10. 10. Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom

Source: Journal of Voice Published:2020


Abstract

Objectives: Laryngeal palpation is a routine clinical method for evaluation of patients with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). The aim of this study was to develop a new comprehensive valid and reliable “laryngeal palpatory scale” (LPS), based on psychometric criteria. Methods: The scale items were selected based on an in-depth analysis of the literature and an expert focus group. Scale item generation and item reduction were followed by a psychometric assessment. Qualitative and quantitative content validity (the content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI)), the qualitative face validity, and the inter-rater reliability were determined. For this purpose, 531 patients were assessed and finally 55 patients with primary MTD (26 women, mean age: 40.8 years, SD: 12.5; 29 male, mean age: 41.6 years, SD: 11.8) participated in the study. A weighted kappa (k*) statistic was used to examine the inter-rater reliability for each single item. Results: Based on the CVR, three items were omitted because they had a score of less than 0.62. The CVI for all remaining items was greater than 0.79 and the scale CVI was equal to 0.96. The final 45 items were a result of the study. The inter-rater reliability for each single item ranged from 0.41 to 1, indicating moderate to almost perfect agreement. Conclusions: The LPS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing patients with MTD. However, future studies are needed to provide adequate data on sensitivity, specificity, concurrent validity, and cutoff scores. © 2018 The Voice Foundation
Other Related Docs
25. Validating the Persian Version of the Self-Stigma of Seeking Help (Ssosh) Scale, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (2024)