Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Surgical Skills Assessment Rubric for Pterygium Surgery Publisher Pubmed



Zareighanavati M1 ; Ghassemi H1 ; Salabati M1 ; Mahmoudzadeh R1 ; Liu C2, 3, 4 ; Daniell M5, 6 ; Huang AJW7 ; Kheirkhah A8 ; Djalilian AR9
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom
  3. 3. Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
  4. 4. Tongdean Eye Clinic, Hove, United Kingdom
  5. 5. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  6. 6. Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  7. 7. Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, MO, United States
  8. 8. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX, United States
  9. 9. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

Source: Ocular Surface Published:2020


Abstract

Purpose: To introduce an assessment tool (rubric) for evaluating ophthalmology residents’ competency in pterygium surgery. Methods: A panel of experienced international surgeons collaborated and developed the rubric. After describing various stages of the procedure, the Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition was used for scoring each stage. After finalizing the rubric, two surgeons independently evaluated 20 masked pterygium surgery videos of 10 residents and scored the videos according to the rubric. The agreement between the scores of them was examined with the intra-class correlation coefficient test. Results: This rubric divides pterygium surgery into 13 different stages and covers the two most common techniques of pterygium surgery; conjunctival autograft and amniotic membrane transplant. The rubric showed face and content validity. Overall, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.96, P < 0.001) was achieved between the two surgeons. The residents scored significantly higher on surgeries performed later in their rotation compared to the earlier surgeries (4.32 ± 0.35 vs 3.96 ± 0.31, P = 0.006). Certain stages of pterygium surgery were more strongly correlated with the residents’ past pterygium surgical experience. Conclusion: This study introduces an international rubric for assessing competency in pterygium surgery. In addition to face and content validity, this rubric shows high inter-rater reliability. This may be a useful tool for teaching and measuring competency in pterygium surgery. © 2020