New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):

Share this content! On (X network) By

New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50 Publisher Pubmed

Alipour S^{1, 2}

Show Affiliations

1. Breast Disease Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2. Department of Surgery, Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Clinical Imaging Published:2021

Abstract

[No abstract available]

Related Docs

1. Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Solid Breast Masses Using Deep Residual Learning-Based Bimodal Computer-Aided Diagnosis System, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (2022)

Experts (# of related papers)

Nasrin Ahmadinejad (1)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Alipour S. "New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50." Clinical Imaging, vol. 69, no. , 2021, pp. 339-340.
APA	Alipour S (2021). New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50. Clinical Imaging, 69(), 339-340.
Chicago	Alipour S. "New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50." Clinical Imaging 69, no. (2021): 339-340.
Harvard	Alipour S (2021) 'New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50', Clinical Imaging, 69(), pp. 339-340.
Vancouver	Alipour S. New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50. Clinical Imaging. 2021;69():339-340.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Alipour S}, title = {New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50}, journal = {Clinical Imaging}, volume = {69}, number = {}, pages = {339-340}, year = {2021} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Alipour S TI - New Breast Masses Should Not Be Categorized As Bi-Rads 3 in Women Above 50 JO - Clinical Imaging VL - 69 IS - SP - 339 EP - 340 PY - 2021 ER -