Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Measuring Health System Efficiency; a Protocol Study Publisher



Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F1 ; Olyaeemanesh A2, 3 ; Mohamadi E2 ; Majdzadeh R4 ; Sari AA2, 5 ; Harirchi I6 ; Haghdoost AA7 ; Sharafi H1 ; Sajadi HS8 ; Goodarzi Z3 ; Hekmat SN9 ; Kiani MM2, 5 ; Freidoony L2, 10 ; Takian A2, 5, 10
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Community Based Participatory Research Centre and Knowledge Utilization Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. The Cancer Institute at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  8. 8. University Research and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Research Center for Health Services Management, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  10. 10. Department of Global Health and Public Policy, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Health Technology Assessment in Action Published:2022


Abstract

Background: To improve healthcare services’ quality, countries should measure their health systems’ efficiency and performance by robust methods. Objectives: We aimed to develop a national study to measure the efficiency of the health system in Iran. Methods: The literature review identified several methods for measuring efficiency; the most common one was data envelopment analysis (DEA). We adopted DEA, but its findings were simplistic and inaccurate, so we began to modify the method by determining the weight of each indicator. We identified the efficiency measurement indicators, in line with international standards and uniformed units, and then readjusted our input/output indicators according to the study context through four expert panels. We collected data and classified the input/output indicators, followed by determining each indicator’s weight and standard limits. Then we rationalized our previous results by applying the revised model. The initial new results of the refined model were valid, accurate, and consistent with previous studies, as approved by experts. We defined proper modeling to achieve the stated objectives. After investigating various DEA models, we finally designed a new model that was consistent with the existing data and conditions, entitled EDEA (extended DEA), to analyze other subprojects. Conclusions: The conventional DEA methods may not be accurate enough to measure health systems’ efficiency. By modifying modeling process, we propose a modified DEA with a very low error rate. We suggest that others interested in measuring health system efficiency adopt our modified approach to increase accuracy and create more meaningful policy-oriented results. © 2021 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.