Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Conducting Systematic Reviews of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Health-Related Measurement Instruments: Finding the Right Tool for the Job Publisher Pubmed



Alavi M1 ; Hunt GE2 ; Thapa DK3 ; Cleary M4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Discipline of Psychiatry, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3. Nepal Public Health Research and Development Center, Kathmandu, Nepal
  4. 4. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, Australia

Source: Issues in Mental Health Nursing Published:2022


Abstract

Many health-related measurement instruments have been developed to measure psychological constructs and whilst several instruments are usually available for a particular study, finding the right tool for the job is important. Systematic reviews of measurement properties of instruments have long been identified as a valuable strategy to ensure that we select the right tool to assess mental health. There are many important steps and procedures to guide these types of systematic reviews to find the “best fit” and this paper summarizes some of these key processes and steps. The selection of instrument(s) to use should be made considering the most recent comprehensive review of the quality of the outcome measurement instrument based on unbiased assessment of its psychometric properties, responsiveness, and generalizability of results. Researchers planning to conduct a systematic review of health-related measurement instruments should design the review beforehand using standardized frameworks. Conducting systematic reviews of the quality and psychometric properties of health-related measurement instruments is important to ensure we choose the best tool for the research question and target population. © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Related Docs
1. Assessment of Risk of Bias in Included Studies, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Stepwise Approach for Medical and Biomedical Researchers (2024)
2. How to Search for Orthotic Literature Using Brace Term?, Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics (2021)
3. Investigating Evaluation Frameworks for Electronic Health Record: A Literature Review, Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (2021)
4. A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Workplace Resilience Measurement Scales, TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology (2020)
5. Technology‑Based Suicide Prevention: An Umbrella Review, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2024)
Experts (# of related papers)