Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparison of Foot Kinetic Parameters Between Pronated and Normal Foot Structures During Forward Jump Landing Publisher Pubmed



Mohammadi HK1 ; Mehravar M1 ; Kalantari KK2 ; Naimi SS2 ; Baghban AA3 ; Okhovatian F2 ; Rezasoltani A2 ; Mohseni Bandpei MA4, 5 ; Taheri N6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  2. 2. Physiotherapy Research Centre, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Proteomics Research Center, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. University Institute of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  6. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Published:2018


Abstract

Background: Pronated foot is one of the most important factors that may lead to musculoskeletal injuries of the lower extremities. It is known that in a pronated foot, excessive mechanical loads are applied to the lower limb structures, which result in the altered foot biomechanics, including vertical ground reaction forces (VGRFs) and rate of loading (ROL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the changes in foot kinetic parameters in the pronated compared to the normal foot structures. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 15 individuals (mean age of 23.27 ± 3.28 years) with asymptomatic pronated feet and 15 normal subjects (mean age of 23.40 ± 3.11 years) were recruited from both genders by using a simple non-random sampling method. VGRF, ROL, and the resultant vector of time to stabilization (RVTTS) were evaluated during the forward jump landing task by using a force plate. Results: The findings showed that the following parameters were significantly higher in the group of pronated feet than in the normal subjects: VGRF (3.30 ± 0.17 vs. 2.81 ± 0.15, p =.042), ROL (0.10 ± 0.01 vs. 0.07 ± 0.006, p =.020), and RVTTS (2592.80 ± 141.24 vs. 2114.00 ± 154.77, p =.030). Conclusion: All the measured foot kinetic parameters were higher in the pronated foot subjects than in the normal participants. An impaired movement control and greater forces imposed on the foot region of the pronated foot, compared to the normal foot individuals, were discovered indicating the former group's possible increase of susceptibility to various musculoskeletal injuries. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Other Related Docs
15. Evaluation of Joint Contact Forces in Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis, Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal (2022)
18. Influence of Foot Insole on the Gait Performance in Subjects With Flat Foot Disorder, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology (2019)
19. Evaluation of the Magnitude of Pistoning Motion of the Below Knee Prostheses, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology (2012)
20. The Effects of Scoliosis on Spinal Muscles Length and Joint Contact Forces, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology (2018)
23. Kinematic Analysis of Walking With Scottish Rite Orthosis, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (2014)
27. Pistoning Assessment in Lower Limb Prosthetic Sockets, Prosthetics and Orthotics International (2012)
36. Role of Spasticity Severity in the Balance of Post-Stroke Patients, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2021)
48. Differences in Center of Pressure Trajectory Between Normal and Steppage Gait, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2010)