Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Rituximab and Glatiramer Acetate in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Cheshmavar M1, 2 ; Mirmosayyeb O1, 2 ; Badihian N1, 3 ; Badihian S4 ; Shaygannejad V1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

Source: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Treatment options for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) are limitedly investigated. We aimed to compare the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) and glatiramer acetate (GA) in SPMS patients. Method: This open, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 84 SPMS patients, assigned to receive RTX or GA for 12 months. In RTX group, patients received 1 g intravenous RTX primarily and then every 6-months. In GA group, patients received 40 mg of GA 3-times/week subcutaneously. We measured EDSS as the primary outcome and neuroimaging findings, relapse rate (RR), and side effects as the secondary outcomes. Results: Seventy-three patients completed the study (37 and 36 in RTX and GA groups, respectively). The mean EDSS increased from 3.05 ± 1.01 to 4.14 ± 0.91 in RTX group (p < 0.001) and from 3.22 ± 1.20 to 4.60 ± 0.67 in GA group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in EDSS between two groups (F(1, 67) = 3.377; p = 0.071). The number of active lesions in brain and cervical spine decreased with no difference between groups (p > 0.05). Also, RR decreased in both groups without significant difference between them (F(1, 67) = 0.390; p = 0.534). Non-serious complications were observed in both groups. Conclusion: Neither RTX nor GA affects EDSS in SPMS patients. They are equally effective in the relapse control of these patients. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Other Related Docs
18. Comparison of Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate and Teriflunomide for Multiple Sclerosis, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry (2019)
26. Anti-Cd20 Therapies for Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2024)
29. Effectiveness of Bupropion on Sexual Dysfunction of Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Clinical Trial, Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (2021)
33. Mizaj Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (Ms) Patients Based on Persian Medicine, Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine (2022)
34. Lateonset Multiple Sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2012)
39. Effects of Rivastigmine on Memory and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (2008)