Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Ergonomic Risk Assessment Methods-Rula, Luba, and Nerpa-To Predict the Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders Publisher



Yazdanirad S1 ; Khoshakhlagh AH2 ; Habibi E3 ; Zare A4 ; Zeinodini M3 ; Dehghani F1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Source: Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Published:2018


Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders are a major problem in all jobs. Several methods are available for assessing the exposure to risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. This study is aimed at comparing three different ergonomic risk assessment methods-rapid upper limb assessment (RULA), loading on the upper body assessment (LUBA), and new ergonomic posture assessment (NERPA) method-to predict upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 210 workers from three different industries including pharmaceutical, automotive, and assembly in the Isfahan province. A Nordic questionnaire was used for determining the levels of musculoskeletal disorders. Then, selected postures were evaluated with RULA, LUBA, and NERPA methods. Finally, data were analyzed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to check the normality distribution of data, Spearman's correlation test to investigate the correlation between the assessed levels with musculoskeletal disorders, and Wilcoxon test to identify significant differences between the values with SPSS version 16. Results: Wilcoxon test revealed a significant difference between the values related to NERPA and RULA (P < 0.001), whereas no significant relation between LUBA and RULA was shown by this test (P = 0.914). The correlation coefficients of the musculoskeletal disorders' level with RULA level, NERPA level, and LUBA level were 0.74, 0.73, and 0.69, respectively. Conclusion: Low-risk levels in NERPA, medium-risk levels in LUBA, and high-risk levels in RULA are evaluated better. The results showed that RULA was the best method for assessing musculoskeletal disorders among the three methods. © 2018 Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer-Medknow.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
33. The Relationships Between Musculoskeletal Disorders and Anthropometric Indices in Public Vehicle Drivers, International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine and Public Health (2012)
39. Corrective Exercises or Ergonomic Principles for Workers With Low Back Pain, Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2021)
43. The Relationship Between Parameters of Static and Dynamic Stability Tests, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2011)
44. Modeling an Integrated Health, Safety, Environment and Ergonomic System for Performance Assessment, International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering (2012)
45. Latent Class-Derived Patterns of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Sedentary Workers and Chair Ergonomic Design, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (2022)