Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Retention of Implant-Supported Zirconium Oxide Ceramic Restorations Using Different Luting Agents Publisher Pubmed



Nejatidanesh F1 ; Savabi O1 ; Shahtoosi M2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics and Torabinejad Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan Univ. of Medical Sci. Biomatr. and Dental Materials Research Group, Isfahan Univ. of Tech., Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research Published:2013


Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention value of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic copings using different luting agents. Method and materials: Twenty ITI solid abutments of 5.5 mm height and ITI implant analogs were mounted vertically into autopolymerizing acrylic resin blocks. Ninety zirconium oxide copings (Cercon, Degudent) with a loop on the occlusal portion were made. All samples were airborne particle abraded with 110 μm Al2O3 and luted using different types of luting agents: resin cements (Clearfil SA, Panavia F2.0, Fuji Plus), conventional cements (Fleck's, Poly F, Fuji I), and temporary cements (Temp Bond, GC free eugenol, TempSpan) with a load of 5 Kg. (N = 10) All copings were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and conditioned in artificial saliva for 1 week, and thermal cycled for 5000 cycles 5-55°C with a 30-s dwell time. The dislodging force of the copings along the long axis of the implant-abutment complex was recorded using universal testing machine with 5 mm/min crosshead speed. Data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0.05) and Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni step down correction (α = 0.001). Results: There was significant difference between the mean rank retention values of different luting agents (P < 0.001). The resin cements showed the highest retention (Clearfil SA, 203.49 ± 52.86; Fuji Plus, 190.61 ± 48.00; Panavia F 2.0, 172.16 ± 70.76 N). The conventional cements had more retention than the temporary cements and glass ionomer cement (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The retention of zircona ceramic restorations, over ITI solid abutments may be influenced by the type of cement. The application of an MDP-containing resin and resin-modified glass ionomer luting agents increase the retentive value of implant-supported zirconium oxide restorations. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Other Related Docs
28. Adhesion to Zirconia: An Umbrella Review, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives (2023)
36. An in Vitro Evaluation of Novel Nha/Zircon Plasma Coating on 316L Stainless Steel Dental Implant, Progress in Natural Science: Materials International (2014)