Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Prolongation of F-Wave Minimal Latency: A Sensitive Predictor of Polyneuropathy Publisher



Jerath NU1, 2 ; Aul E1, 2 ; Reddy CG3 ; Azadeh H4 ; Swenson A1, 2 ; Kimura J1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
  2. 2. Iowa City Veterans Affair Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, United States
  3. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
  4. 4. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: International Journal of Neuroscience Published:2016


Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the sensitivity of F-wave minimal latencies, we compared F-waves with motor and sensory nerve conduction studies (MNCS and SNCS) in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Methods: A retrospective chart review conducted in 484 patients confirmed the clinical evidence of a polyneuropathy, and studies of F-wave minimal latencies as well as MNCS and SNCS in each patient. Results: Overall rate of abnormality reached 469/484 (96.9%) for F-wave minimal latencies as compared to 374/484 (77%) for nerve conduction studies (p < 0.0001). Nerve-specific abnormalities of F-waves showed 290/354 (82%), 140/171 (82%), 367/398 (92%) and 357/376 (95%) for median, ulnar, peroneal and tibial nerves, respectively. Corresponding values for MNCS consisted of 108/354 (31%), 29/171 (17%), 258/398 (65%) and 189/376 (50%) (all p < 0.0001). In contrast, SNCS revealed abnormalities in 120/333 (36%), 60/159 (38%) and 266/474 (56%) of median, ulnar and sural nerves. Conclusion: F-wave minimal latencies serve as the best predictor of polyneuropathy followed by SNCS and then MNCS. Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis.