Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Working Memory Dysfunction Differs Between Secondary Progressive and Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Effects of Clinical Phenotype, Age, Disease Duration, and Disability Publisher Pubmed



Pourmohammadi A1, 2, 3 ; Motahharynia A2, 3 ; Shaygannejad V2, 3, 4 ; Ashtari F2, 3, 4 ; Adibi I2, 3, 4 ; Sanayei M1, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Center for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Cognitive dysfunction is relatively common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Although it occurs in all stages and all phenotypes of MS, it is more prevalent in secondary progressive MS (SPMS) compared to relapsing MS (RMS). It is unclear whether the higher frequency of cognitive impairment in SPMS is linked to the progressive phenotype or other clinical factors. In this study, we compared working memory in patients with RMS, SPMS, and healthy subjects. We also investigated the effects of age, disease duration, and disability on working memory performance. Methods: This case-control study enrolled 134 MS patients, 69 patients were diagnosed with RMS and 65 patients with SPMS, and 77 healthy control subjects. We designed two working memory tasks with different sets of stimuli (face vs. checkerboard) and different instructions (same or different vs. which one is the same). Results: Accuracy was significantly more impaired in SPMS patients than in RMS patients and both groups were worse than healthy subjects. This finding was similar between both tasks. Age and overall cognitive functions (measured with MoCA) also affected accuracy, but disease duration and disability only affected accuracy in working memory task with checkerboard stimuli. Conclusion: MS patients are impaired in keeping the information in the visual working memory for a few seconds. Progressive phenotype significantly affected working memory accuracy, and this effect did not explain out with other demographic or clinical factors. Future studies are needed to reveal underlying mechanisms of working memory dysfunction in SPMS and working memory dysfunction as a biomarker of disease progression. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
Other Related Docs
11. Effects of Rivastigmine on Memory and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (2008)
19. Lateonset Multiple Sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2012)
21. Naming Error in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Pilot Study in Isfahan, Iran, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2019)
29. Speed of Word Retrieval in Multiple Sclerosis, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2013)
32. Thalamic Asymmetry in Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2023)
36. Seizure in Iranian Patients With Multiple Sclerosis, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2013)
38. The Association Between Multiple Sclerosis and Migraine: A Meta-Analysis, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2023)
39. Comparing Body Image in Ms Patients and Healthy Individuals, International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture (2020)
40. Prevalence of Familial Multiple Sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2011)
48. Category-Semantic Memory Deficit in Multiple Sclerosis, Tehran University Medical Journal (2009)