Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Success Rate and Safety of Nasotracheal Intubation by Conventional and Finger-Guided Method in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Surgery Publisher



Hashemi S1 ; Shetabi H1 ; Talakoub R1 ; Aminizad A2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Advanced Biomedical Research Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Different techniques have been introduced to reduce the complications of nasotracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of nasotracheal intubation complications in finger-guided and conventional methods. Materials and Methods: In this double-blind randomized trial study, 70 patients who were candidates for oral and maxillofacial surgery who required nasal intubation were included in the study finally of which 33 patients with conventional method and 35 patients with finger-guided tubes in the nasopharynx were analyzed at the end of the study. Variables such as success rate, hemodynamic response, and complications of intubation were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hemodynamic response to intubation (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of success in tracheal intubation (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of epistaxis immediately after intubation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of nasal turbine fractures (P > 0.05). However, the frequency of submucosal intubation in the conventional method was significantly higher than the other group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Nasotracheal intubation using the finger guiding technique in the nasopharynx is associated with a higher success rate and less complications after intubation such as epistaxis and submucosal intubation compared to the conventional method. © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
16. Prediction of Prolonged Laryngoscopy, Anaesthesia (2001)
25. Septoplasty: Assessment With Rhinomanometry, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2007)
35. The Effects of Partial Turbinectomy on Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty, Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (2011)
36. The Effect of Maxillary Multidirectional Movement on Nasal Respiration, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2009)