Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparison of the Ultrasonographic Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area at the Wrist and the Wrist-To-Forearm Ratio in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome



Abrishamchi F1 ; Zaki B1 ; Basiri K1 ; Ghasemi M1 ; Mohaghegh M1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2014

Abstract

Background: Electrophysiologic (EDX) study is the most valuable method in grading the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), but it is invasive and painful. We evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound for this purpose. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one wrists of 52 consecutive patients with clinical evidences of CTS, confirmed and graded by EDX as mild, moderate, and severe, were examined by ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was measured at the distal wrist (CSA-D), and proximal forearm (CSA-P), and wrist-to-forearm ratio (WFR) was calculated for each hand. Results: The mean CSA-D was 0.12 cm2 ± 0.03, 0.15 cm2 ± 0.03 and 0.19 cm2 ± 0.06 and the mean WFR was 2.77 ± 1.14, 3.07 ± 1.07 and 4.07 ± 1.61 in mild, moderate and severe groups respectively. WFR showed significant differences between the severe and none severe CTS groups (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between mild and moderate CTS groups (P < 0.381). CSA-D showed a significant difference between all groups (P < 0.0001). In the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of the CSA-D and WFR for detecting severe CTS were 0.15 (area under the curve 0.784, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.662-0.898, P < 0.001, sensitivity of 68.2% and specificity of 70.9%) and 3 (area under the curve 0.714, 95% CI: 0.585-0.84, P = 0.001, sensitivity of 68.2% and specificity of 64.8%) respectively. All values were superior in CSA-D. Conclusion: Ultrasonography, can be complementary but not conclusive to the classification of CTS severities. CSA-D and WFR both increased in proportion to CTS severity, but neither parameter exhibited excellent performance in grading the severities. © 2014, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.
2. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2019)
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
12. Hour Glass Constriction in Advanced Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2013)
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Clinical Examination in Upper Limb Injuries, Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock (2011)
21. Evaluation of Ulnar Neuropathy on Hemodialysis Patients, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2012)
22. Relationship Between Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (2010)
24. Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Trial of Vitamin B6, Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (2012)
28. The Coincidence of Radial Tunnel Syndrome With Tennis Elbow, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2015)