Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Distraction Osteogenesis in the Hand With and Without K-Wire



Omranifard M1 ; Abdali H1 ; Shafaiee Y2 ; Kabiri P3 ; Aminpour F4, 5 ; Ansari AM6 ; Jazebi N6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Biostatics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is an established option for reconstruction of amputated fingers. In contrast to the primary method of distraction osteogenesis, using Kirschner wire (K-wire) as an internal fixator is not common today. This study was conducted to evaluate distraction osteogenesis with and without K-wire. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 16 amputated fingers which were divided into two equal groups. While we used both orthofix M-100 and K-wire in the first group, only orthofix M-100 was implemented in the second group. The results were analyzed by t-test in SPSS11.5. RESULTS: Overall, 16 fingers of 8 male patients whose one or more fingers were cut due to hand trauma were evaluated in two random groups. The mean daily lengthening rates in Groups 1 and 2 were 0.44 ± 0.17 mm and 0.4 ± 0.11 mm, respectively (p = 0.59). The mean time required for 1 cm lengthening was 18.71 ± 4.07 and 23.25 ± 4.56 days in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.065). The mean value of overall lengthening was 16.25 ± 8.05 mm in Group 1 and 16.69 ± 4.89 mm in Group 2 (p = 0.89). Moreover, some minor complications occurred in 9 samples. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, in the K-wire group, the time needed for 1 cm lengthening was clinically shorter. In addition, fewer complications, such as non-union and length loss, were observed in Group 1.