Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Improvement of Care Cascade for Hypertension and Diabetes in Rural China: Protocol for an Implementation Study Publisher Pubmed



Yin X1, 2 ; Wang Z1 ; Yang J1 ; Li J1 ; Han S1 ; Feng W3 ; Liu Q4 ; Li N5 ; Zhang L6 ; Ke J1 ; Wei X1 ; Zhang J1 ; Sarrafzadegan N7 ; Shao R1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  2. 2. The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3. Gongyi People's Hospital, Gongyi, China
  4. 4. Wugang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wugang, China
  5. 5. Weifang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Weifang, China
  6. 6. Linqu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Linqu, China
  7. 7. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Clinical Hypertension Published:2024


Abstract

The management of hypertension and diabetes poses significant challenges to China's healthcare system, necessitating seamless patient progression through screening, diagnosis, management, and control. Utilizing the care cascade model, this study aims to systematically identify patient drop-offs and devise strategies to address healthcare delivery bottlenecks for hypertension and diabetes in rural China. This study consists of three phases. In Phase 1, qualitative interviews are conducted to explore healthcare experiences and identify determinants across the care cascade. Phase 2 involves systematically assessing barriers identified in Phase 1 and collaborating with local stakeholders using intervention mapping and co-design to generate interventions and implementation strategies. Phase 3 is a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 48 villages, randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to compare changes in hypertension and diabetes care. Intervention villages will implement interventions developed in Phase 2 for 1 year, while control villages will continue with usual care. Primary outcomes include between-group differences in achieving blood pressure and glycemic targets, along with service and implementation outcomes. This study aims to identify the stage with the largest patient retention gap in the care cascade and develop intervention strategies through participatory co-design with practitioners, emphasizing feasible, low-cost approaches. The pragmatic cluster RCT will assess strategy effectiveness, offering valuable insights for practical interventions to enhance hypertension and diabetes care in rural settings, potentially shaping impactful programs and improving healthcare outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. identifier: NCT06141278. © 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Other Related Docs
10. How Do Hospitals Organize Diabetes Services? a Comparative Study, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2023)
17. Developing “Aryan:” Diabetes Self‑Care Mobile Application, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2019)
23. Adherence Barriers to Treatment of Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Qualitative Study, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2022)