Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers

Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers

Shemirani H¹ ; Tafti FD¹ ; Amirpour A¹

Show Affiliations

1. Department of Cardiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2014

Abstract

Background: No-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is relatively common and has therapeutic and prognostic implications. Cigarette smoking is known as deleterious in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but the effect of smoking on no-reflow phenomenon is less investigated. The aim of this study was to compare no-reflow phenomenon after percutneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction, between smokers and non smokers.Materials and Methods: A total of 141 patients who were admitted to Chamran Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) between March and September, 2012 with a diagnosis of STEMI, enrolled into our Cohort study. Patients were divided into current smoker and nonsmoker groups (based on patient’s information). All patients underwent primary PCI or rescue PCI within the first 12-h of chest pain. No-reflow phenomenon, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (MI) flow, and 24-h complications were assessed in both groups.Results: A total of 47 current smoker cases (32.9%) and 94 (65.7%) nonsmoker cases were evaluated. Smokers in comparison to nonsmokers were younger (53.47 ± 10.59 vs. 61.46 ± 10.55, P < 0.001) and they were less likely to be hypertensive (15.2% vs. 44.7%, P < 0.001), diabetic (17% vs. 36.2%, P < 0.05), and female gender (4.3% vs. 25.5%, P < 0.01). Angiographic and procedural characteristics of both groups were similar. 9 patients died during the first 24-h after PCI (4.3% of smokers and 6.4% of nonsmokers, P: 0.72). No-reflow phenomenon was observed in 29.8% of current smokers and 31.5% of nonsmokers (P = 0.77).Conclusion: No-reflow phenomenon or short-term complications were not significantly different between current smokers and non smokers. © 2014, Research India Publications.

Related Docs

View other Related Docs

1. Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of Slow Flow/No Reflow Phenomenon After Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in St-Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Egyptian Heart Journal (2024)

2. Factors Associated With the No-Reflow Phenomenon Following Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Coronary Bypass Grafts, ARYA Atherosclerosis (2017)

3. The Assessment of No-Reflow Phenomenon Incidence in Early Versus Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following a Primary Fibrinolysis, ARYA Atherosclerosis (2024)

4. The Comparison of Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Thrombolytic-Facilitated and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Stemi): Findings From Prove/Acs Study, ARYA Atherosclerosis (2020)

5. Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Value of Angiographic Slow/No-Reflow Phenomenon After Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease (2024)

6. Analysis of Traditional Risk Factors on St-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Characteristics; [بررسی عوامل خطر سنتی مرتبط با ویژگیهای بالینی بیماران انفارکتوس میوکارد با بالارونده قطعه St], Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2024)

7. The Pragmatic Role of Covid-19 on the Thrombus Grade of Patients With Contemporary St-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Journal of Tehran University Heart Center (2022)

8. Does Opioid Addiction Influence Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in Stemi Patients Undergoing Emergency Pci?, Advanced Biomedical Research (2023)

Experts (# of related papers)

View all Related Experts

Masoumeh Sadeghi (18)

Afshin Amirpour (8)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Shemirani H, Tafti FD, Amirpour A. "Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers." Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, vol. 19, no. 11, 2014, pp. 1068-1073.
APA	Shemirani H, Tafti FD, Amirpour A (2014). Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(11), 1068-1073.
Chicago	Shemirani H, Tafti FD, Amirpour A. "Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers." Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 19, no. 11 (2014): 1068-1073.
Harvard	Shemirani H, Tafti FD, Amirpour A (2014) 'Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers', Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(11), pp. 1068-1073.
Vancouver	Shemirani H, Tafti FD, Amirpour A. Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2014;19(11):1068-1073.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Shemirani H and Tafti FD and Amirpour A}, title = {Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers}, journal = {Journal of Research in Medical Sciences}, volume = {19}, number = {11}, pages = {1068-1073}, year = {2014} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Shemirani H AU - Tafti FD AU - Amirpour A TI - Comparison of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Smokers and Nonsmokers JO - Journal of Research in Medical Sciences VL - 19 IS - 11 SP - 1068 EP - 1073 PY - 2014 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Authors Affiliations

Abstract