Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Assessment of National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index and Other Quality Characterization of Mamloo Dam and Supporting Streams Publisher



Parastar S1 ; Jalilzadeh A2 ; Poureshg Y3 ; Hashemi M4 ; Rezaee A4 ; Hossini H4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Student Research Center, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering Published:2015


Abstract

Aims: This study was aimed to determine national sanitation foundation water quality index (NSFWQI), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and some other parameters such as electricity conductivity (EC) and sodium percent (%Na) to investigate the quality of the Jajrood and the Damavand rivers, the mix of them and Mamloo dam. Materials and Methods: The tested parameters were pH, dissolved oxygen, biochemical oxygen demand, total solids, nitrate, phosphate, turbidity, temperature, fecal coliform, EC, Na, potassium (K), calcium and magnesium. The used indices were NSFWQI, SAR, %Na and magnesium hazard. Results: average WQI for the Jajrood river (S1), Damavand river (S2), mix of S1 and S2 (S3) and the Mamloo dam (S4) were 71.7 (good), 64.5 (medium), 70.6 (medium) and 77.3 (good), respectively. According to USA Laboratory Diagram and Wilcox diagram, all the sampling points were in C3-S1 (very good to good classes), C2-S1 (good to permissible classes) categories. Conclusion: According to the results, the water of sampling points is unsuitable for direct human consumption. However, for the S1, S2 and S3 as drinking water, advanced treatment may be needed. For S4 as a drinking water source, conventional treatment may be necessary. All the sampling points are suitable for irrigation purposes under normal conditions. © 2014 Parastar S. This is an open‑access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
12. Heavy Metals in Water and Sediment: A Case Study of Tembi River, Journal of Environmental and Public Health (2014)
15. Implementation of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points in the Drinking Water Supply System, International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering (2012)
19. The Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on the Activity of Soil Microorganisms, Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development (2021)