Artificial Intelligence for Classification and Detection of Oral Mucosa Lesions on Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed

Summary: AI achieves 74-100% accuracy in detecting oral mucosa lesions, potentially aiding non-specialists, but benefits need clarification. #AIHealth #OralHealth

Rokhshad R¹ ; Mohammadrahimi H^{1, 2} ; Price JB³ ; Shoorgashti R⁴ ; Abbasiparashkouh Z⁵ ; Esmaeili M⁴ ; Sarfaraz B² ; Rokhshad A⁴ ; Motamedian SR⁶ ; Soltani P^{7, 9} ; Schwendicke F^{1, 8}
Source: Clinical Oral Investigations Published:2024

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to review and synthesize studies using artificial intelligence (AI) for classifying, detecting, or segmenting oral mucosal lesions on photographs. Materials and method: Inclusion criteria were (1) studies employing AI to (2) classify, detect, or segment oral mucosa lesions, (3) on oral photographs of human subjects. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE, arXiv, medRxiv, and grey literature (Google Scholar) search was conducted until June 2023, without language limitation. Results: After initial searching, 36 eligible studies (from 8734 identified records) were included. Based on QUADAS-2, only 7% of studies were at low risk of bias for all domains. Studies employed different AI models and reported a wide range of outcomes and metrics. The accuracy of AI for detecting oral mucosal lesions ranged from 74 to 100%, while that for clinicians un-aided by AI ranged from 61 to 98%. Pooled diagnostic odds ratio for studies which evaluated AI for diagnosing or discriminating potentially malignant lesions was 155 (95% confidence interval 23–1019), while that for cancerous lesions was 114 (59–221). Conclusions: AI may assist in oral mucosa lesion screening while the expected accuracy gains or further health benefits remain unclear so far. Clinical relevance: Artificial intelligence assists oral mucosa lesion screening and may foster more targeted testing and referral in the hands of non-specialist providers, for example. So far, it remains unclear if accuracy gains compared with specialized can be realized. © 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.