Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Ovarian Stimulation in Follicular and Luteal Phases in an Ovarian Cycle (Duostim) in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response Publisher



Naghshineh E1 ; Aalamiharandi R2 ; Heydari N1 ; Shahabi V3 ; Borumandnia N4 ; Salehi S2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Urology and Nephrology Research Centre, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Infertility is a global problem that refers to the absence of pregnancy after 12 months of intercourse without using contraception. Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are a treatment technique for infertile patients. Poor ovarian response to stimulation (POR) is one of the challenges in the field of ART. POR refers to people in whom, despite appropriate ovarian stimulation, the number of oocytes retrieved is less than expected. Several ovarian stimulation protocols are applied in POR patients, but the best protocol is not defined. One of the protocols used in POR patients is the double stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) protocol. During the DuoStim protocol, both follicular and luteal phases of an ovarian cycle are stimulated. It allows us to retrieve oocytes twice in one ovarian cycle. In the current study, ovarian stimulation in follicular and luteal phases in an ovarian cycle in patients with the poor ovarian response is compared. Results: Twenty-six infertile patients with poor ovarian enrolled. They had a mean ± standard deviation age of 36.3 ± 3.15 years. The duration of follicular phase stimulation (FPS) was shorter than luteal phase stimulation (LPS) (pvalue = 0.003). The total dose of gonadotropin was significantly lower in FPS than in LPS (pvalue = 0.013). Significantly fewer total oocytes were retrieved after FPS than after LPS (pvalue = 0.001). Conclusion: This study supports the putative benefits of LPS in infertile women with POR. Utilizing the DuoStim strategy in people with poor ovarian response caused more oocytes to be retrieved. Trial registration: irct.ir identifier: IRCT20221001056068N1, 11/22/2022, https://www.irct.ir/trial/66187. © 2023, The Author(s).
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
13. Efficacy of Communication Skills Training Workshop on Sexual Function in Infertile Women, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2015)
22. Impact of Body Mass Index Versus Physical Activity and Calorie Intake on Assisted Reproduction Outcomes, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2012)