Different Stroke Scales; Which Scale or Scales Should Be Used? Publisher



Alijanpour S^{1, 2} ; Mostafazdehbora M³ ; Ahangar AA⁴ Show Affiliations
Source: Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine Published:2021

Abstract

Background: There has been a considerable development in the clinometric of stroke. But researchers are concerned that some scales are too generic, inherently and the insight may not be provided. The current study was conducted to determine which scale or scales should be used in stroke survivors. Methods: We selected 67 studies which were published between January 2010 and December 2018 from Up to date, CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Elsevier and Web of Science with MeSH terms. Inclusion criteria were: clinical trials, prospective studies, retrospective cohort studies, or cross-sectional studies; original research in adult human stroke survivors. We excluded the following articles: non-adult population; highly selected studies or treatment studies without incidence data; commentaries, single case reports, review article, editorials and non-English articles or articles without full text available. Results: Face Arm Speech Test and Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale scales because it was easy to learn and rapidly administer the recommended dose to use in pre-hospital, but there are not gold standard in stroke diagnosis in Pre-Hospital. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale valuable in the acute stage for middle cerebral artery, not chronic or long term post stroke outcome. The Barthel Index scores for approximately three weeks could predict activities of daily living disabilities in 6 months. Conclusion: Every scale has an advantage and a disadvantage and we were not able to introduce the gold standard for each item, but some special scales were used more in the studies, preferred for comparing with other studies to match the research results. © 2020, Babol University of Medical Sciences