Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Decision Framework for Identifying Methods to Construct Stable Composite Indicators That Capture the Concept of Multidimensional Social Phenomena: The Case of Social Exclusion Publisher



Liborio MP1 ; Diniz AMA2 ; Rabieidastjerd H3, 4 ; Martinuci ODS5 ; Martins CAPDS1 ; Ekel PI1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Graduate Program in Computer Science, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 30535-901, Brazil
  2. 2. Graduate Program in Geography, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 30535-901, Brazil
  3. 3. School of Architecture, Planning, and Environmental Policy & CeADAR, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland
  4. 4. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, 81746-73461, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Geography, Maringa State University, Maringa, 87020-900, Brazil

Source: Sustainability (Switzerland) Published:2023


Abstract

This research proposes a decision framework that allows for the identification of the most suitable methods to construct stable composite indicators that capture the concept of multidimensional social phenomena. This decision framework is applied to discover which method among six best represents the social exclusion of eight medium-sized Brazilian cities. The results indicate that space is important in the definition and performance of the method, and ease methods to apply present the best performance. However, one of them fails to capture the concept of the multidimensional phenomenon in two cities. The research makes six important contributions to the literature. First, it offers a decision framework for choosing the best-fit method to construct a composite social indicator. Second, it shows to what extent geographic space matters in defining the best-fit method. Third, it identifies the best-fit method regarding stability and linkage with the conceptually most significant indicator of social exclusion. Fourth, it reveals the methods to be avoided, given their poor performance. Fifth, it indicates the mathematical properties that best represent composite social phenomena. Sixth, it illuminates the debate on social exclusion from a geographical and public policy perspective. © 2023 by the authors.