Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluation of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Cerebral Vein Thrombosis: A Case-Control Blinded Study Publisher



Khorvash F1 ; Farajpourkhanaposhtani MJ2 ; Hemasian H2 ; Saadatnia SM1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Isfahan Neuroscience Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Current Journal of Neurology Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Anticoagulation therapy following cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) can improve mortality and morbidity. Vitamin K antagonists are currently the routine oral anticoagulant used for CVT; while by introduction of rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, the attentions have been deviated toward novel agents, but the evidence is not strong. The current study is aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for anticoagulation therapy of CVT. Methods: The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 50 patients with CVT among which, 25 ones were randomly allocated to rivaroxaban treatment (20 mg per day for three months) and remained 25 ones to warfarin treatment [adjusted based on international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3]. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and clinical investigations, including the incidence of seizure, papilledema, intra/extra-cranial bleeding, blurred vision, headache, nausea and vomiting, and death were evaluated at discharge time and within 3 and 6 months following CVT incidence; eventually, two groups were compared. Results: Comparison of mRS scores between the groups revealed significant differences in none of the interval assessments, at the time of admission (P = 0.510), within three months (P = 0.630), and within six months (P = 0.990), while both of the approaches led to significant decrease in mRS scores following both of the treatments (P < 0.001). The comparison of drug-related adverse effects showed insignificant difference between warfarin versus rivaroxaban (P > 0.050). Conclusion: Based on this study, rivaroxaban is an efficacious agent for the treatment of CVT without remarkable adverse effects. © 2021 Iranian Neurological Association, and Tehran University of Medical Sciences Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Other Related Docs
10. Anticoagulant Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Review of Literature, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2012)
19. Cerebral Vein and Sinus Thrombosis in Isfahan-Iran: A Changing Profile, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (2004)
28. Anticoagulation Therapy in Covid-19 Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2021)
30. Asian Study of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (2019)