Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate and Teriflunomide for Multiple Sclerosis Publisher Pubmed



Kalincik T1, 2 ; Kubala Havrdova E3 ; Horakova D3 ; Izquierdo G4 ; Prat A5, 6 ; Girard M5, 6 ; Duquette P5, 6 ; Grammond P7 ; Onofrj M8 ; Lugaresi A9, 10 ; Ozakbas S11 ; Kappos L12 ; Kuhle J12 ; Terzi M13 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Kalincik T1, 2
  2. Kubala Havrdova E3
  3. Horakova D3
  4. Izquierdo G4
  5. Prat A5, 6
  6. Girard M5, 6
  7. Duquette P5, 6
  8. Grammond P7
  9. Onofrj M8
  10. Lugaresi A9, 10
  11. Ozakbas S11
  12. Kappos L12
  13. Kuhle J12
  14. Terzi M13
  15. Lechnerscott J14, 15
  16. Boz C16
  17. Grandmaison F17
  18. Prevost J18
  19. Sola P19
  20. Ferraro D19
  21. Granella F20, 21
  22. Trojano M22
  23. Bergamaschi R23
  24. Pucci E24
  25. Turkoglu R25
  26. Mccombe PA26
  27. Pesch VV27
  28. Van Wijmeersch B28
  29. Solaro C29
  30. Ramotello C30
  31. Slee M31
  32. Alroughani R32
  33. Yamout B33
  34. Shaygannejad V34
  35. Spitaleri D35
  36. Sanchezmenoyo JL36
  37. Ampapa R37
  38. Hodgkinson S38
  39. Karabudak R39
  40. Butler E40
  41. Vucic S41
  42. Jokubaitis V42
  43. Spelman T42
  44. Butzkueven H42, 43, 44
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3050, VIC, Australia
  2. 2. Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  3. 3. Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  4. 4. Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
  5. 5. Montreal, Hopital Notre-Dame, Quebec, Canada
  6. 6. CHUM, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  7. 7. CISSS de Chaudiere-Appalaches, Levis, QC, Canada
  8. 8. Department of Neuroscience Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University G d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
  9. 9. Bologna, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italy
  10. 10. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  11. 11. Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
  12. 12. Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  13. 13. Medical Faculty, 19 Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  14. 14. School of Medicine and Public Health, University Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  15. 15. Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  16. 16. KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
  17. 17. Neuro Rive-Sud, Quebec City, QC, Canada
  18. 18. CSSS Saint-Jerome, Saint-Jerome, QC, Canada
  19. 19. Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, Italy
  20. 20. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  21. 21. Department of Emergency and General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
  22. 22. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
  23. 23. IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
  24. 24. UOC Neurologia, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche-AV3, Macerata, Italy
  25. 25. Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  26. 26. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  27. 27. Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  28. 28. Rehabilitation and MS, Centre Overpelt and Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
  29. 29. Department of Neurology, ASL3 Genovese, Department of Rehabilitation, ML Novarese Hospital Moncrivello, Genova, Italy
  30. 30. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  31. 31. Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  32. 32. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Sharq, Kuwait
  33. 33. Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
  34. 34. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  35. 35. Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino, Avellino, Italy
  36. 36. Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Spain
  37. 37. Nemocnice Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic
  38. 38. Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
  39. 39. Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  40. 40. Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  41. 41. Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  42. 42. Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  43. 43. Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  44. 44. Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Source: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Published:2019


Abstract

Objective Oral immunotherapies have become a standard treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Direct comparison of their effect on relapse and disability is needed. Methods We identified all patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod, with minimum 3-month treatment persistence and disability follow-up in the global MSBase cohort study. Patients were matched using propensity scores. Three pairwise analyses compared annualised relapse rates and hazards of disability accumulation, disability improvement and treatment discontinuation (analysed with negative binomial models and weighted conditional survival models, with pairwise censoring). Results The eligible cohorts consisted of 614 (teriflunomide), 782 (dimethyl fumarate) or 2332 (fingolimod) patients, followed over the median of 2.5 years. Annualised relapse rates were lower on fingolimod compared with teriflunomide (0.18 vs 0.24; p=0.05) and dimethyl fumarate (0.20 vs 0.26; p=0.01) and similar on dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide (0.19 vs 0.22; p=0.55). No differences in disability accumulation (p≥0.59) or improvement (p≥0.14) were found between the therapies. In patients with ≥3-month treatment persistence, subsequent discontinuations were less likely on fingolimod than teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate (p<0.001). Discontinuation rates on teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate were similar (p=0.68). Conclusion The effect of fingolimod on relapse frequency was superior to teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate. The effect of the three oral therapies on disability outcomes was similar during the initial 2.5 years on treatment. Persistence on fingolimod was superior to the two comparator drugs. © 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other Related Docs
23. Promising Effect of Rapamycin on Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2018)
42. Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis in Children, Iranian Journal of Child Neurology (2016)