Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Hospital Performance Evaluation Indicators: A Scoping Review Publisher Pubmed



Hadian SA1 ; Rezayatmand R2 ; Shaarbafchizadeh N3 ; Ketabi S4 ; Pourghaderi AR5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Student Research Committee, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Hospital Management Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

Source: BMC Health Services Research Published:2024


Abstract

Background: Hospitals are the biggest consumers of health system budgets and hence measuring hospital performance by quantitative or qualitative accessible and reliable indicators is crucial. This review aimed to categorize and present a set of indicators for evaluating overall hospital performance. Methods: We conducted a literature search across three databases, i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using possible keyword combinations. We included studies that explored hospital performance evaluation indicators from different dimensions. Results: We included 91 English language studies published in the past 10 years. In total, 1161 indicators were extracted from the included studies. We classified the extracted indicators into 3 categories, 14 subcategories, 21 performance dimensions, and 110 main indicators. Finally, we presented a comprehensive set of indicators with regard to different performance dimensions and classified them based on what they indicate in the production process, i.e., input, process, output, outcome and impact. Conclusion: The findings provide a comprehensive set of indicators at different levels that can be used for hospital performance evaluation. Future studies can be conducted to validate and apply these indicators in different contexts. It seems that, depending on the specific conditions of each country, an appropriate set of indicators can be selected from this comprehensive list of indicators for use in the performance evaluation of hospitals in different settings. © The Author(s) 2024.