Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Impact of Accreditation on Nurses' Perceptions of Quality of Care in Iran and Its Barriers and Facilitators Publisher Pubmed



Reisi N1 ; Raeissi P2 ; Sokhanvar M3 ; Kakemam E4, 5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Noncommunicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Student Research Committee, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Source: International Journal of Health Planning and Management Published:2019


Abstract

Background: Iran national hospital accreditation was initiated as a government and mandatory program in 2012. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of accreditation on nurses' perceptions of quality of care and to determine those barriers and facilitators needed for effective implementation of accreditation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey conducted in 43 tertiary public hospitals in 5 metropolises, Iran, which successfully passed national accreditation surveys. Participants included nurses with at least 5-year work experience. Overall response rate was 76%, with 1312 of 1706 valid responses included in the data analysis. A questionnaire was applied using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. In addition, the questionnaire included 2 open-ended questions allowing the respondent to identify barriers and facilitators to the process of for improving accreditation implementation. The relationship between the quality of results and the independent variables was tested using multiple regression analysis. Results: The scales measuring benefits of accreditation had the highest mean score followed by strategic quality planning, education and training, and staff involvement. Regression analysis indicated that leadership, commitment, and support; education and training; rewards and recognition; and staff involvement were factors affecting quality results. Barriers encountered included financial and capital resources, staff, institutional, and patients. Hospital accreditation has a positive impact on quality of care. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide valuable information to policymakers and hospital managers on which to base the process of accreditation and its requirements, and to help reap its benefits. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Other Related Docs
26. Barriers to Providing Spiritual Care From a Nurses' Perspective: A Content Analysis Study, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2022)
30. Proposing a Framework for Accreditation of Dental Clinics in Iran, Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research (2022)
31. The Role of Nursing Consultant in Iran: A Qualitative Study, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2019)
32. Experiences of Nurses in Caring for Patients With Covid-19: A Qualitative Research, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2023)
35. Effective Factors in Providing Holistic Care: A Qualitative Study, Indian Journal of Palliative Care (2015)
39. Ph.D. in Nursing From Theory to Reality, Journal of Medicinal and Chemical Sciences (2021)
46. Pediatric Ward Nurses' Caring Self-Efficacy Scale: Development and Validation, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2021)