Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Assessment of Sedation Level in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Is Bispectral Index Correlated With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale?



Hashemi SJ1 ; Soltani H1 ; Talakoob R1 ; Soleymani B2 ; Zeraatkari K3 ; Shahin S4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medical Surgical Nursery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Al-Zahra Central ICU, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2008

Abstract

Background: The intensivist should be avoided over or under sedation in mechanically ventilated patients. There are controversies in validity of bispectral index (BIS) in the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate sedation level in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients in our ICU using BIS and Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS, as a valid tool) and to determine the correlation between these two methods of evaluation. Methods: Following the institutional research committee approval, we prospectively determined the sedation level in 33 patients aged 20-75 years who were mechanically ventilated and sedated routinely using intravenous diazepam (0.05 - 0.1 mg/kg/6 hr) combined with intravenous morphine (0.05 - 0.1 mg/kg/6 hr) in central ICU of Al-Zahra hospital. In each patient, we assessed BIS (0 to 100) values and also RASS (-5 to +4) twice a day, two hours after receiving systemic sedation in the morning and evening during mechanical ventilation period. Appropriate sedation score was considered -2 and -3 on RASS and 70 to 80 in BIS. Lower or greater values were considered as under- or over-sedation, respectively. Data were analyzed using chi-square and spearman's correlation tests. Results: In this study, sedation level was assessed in patients using RASS (201 times) and BIS (201 times) methods. The frequency (percent) of under-sedated, appropriately sedated and over-sedated patients with BIS assessments were 121 (60.2%), 35 (17.4%) and 45 (22.4%), respectively. These values for RASS assessments were 196 (97.5%), zero, and 5 (2.5%), respectively. There was a weak correlation between BIS and RASS for determination of sedation level (P = 0, r = 0.245). Conclusions: This study showed that most of our ICU patients were under-sedated. BIS was poorly correlated with RASS in assessing the depth of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
11. Risk Factors of Re-Intubation of Patients in Intensive Care Units, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2007)
13. Premedication Propofol Dose to Prevent Emergency Delirium, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry (2022)
19. Reintubation in Patients With Acute Poisoning: Risk Factor Analysis, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2018)
36. The Advantages of “Closed” Type Management in Intensive Care Units, Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care (2024)