Association of Passive and Active Smoking With Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction in Iranian Children and Adolescents: The Caspian Iv Study Publisher Pubmed



Heshmat R¹ ; Qorbani M^{2, 3} ; Safiri S⁴ ; Eslamishahr Babaki A¹ ; Matin N¹ ; Motamedgorji N¹ ; Motlagh ME⁵ ; Djalalinia S⁶ ; Ardalan G⁷ ; Mansourian M⁸ ; Asayesh H⁹ ; Kelishadi R⁷ Show Affiliations
Source: BMJ Open Published:2017

Abstract

Objective: To assess the joint association of passive and active smoking with self-rated health and life satisfaction among Iranian children and adolescents. Methods: Using a multistage random cluster sampling method, a representative sample of 14 880 school students were selected from urban and rural areas of 30 provinces of Iran. Data were gathered using a questionnaire, a weight scale and metre. Participants were classified into four groups based on their smoking patterns: 'non-smoker', 'only active smoker', 'only passive smoker' and 'active and passive smoker'. Life satisfaction (LS) and self-rated health (SRH) were assessed by self-administered validated questionnaires based on the WHO-Global Schoolbased student Health Survey (WHO-GSHS). Data were analysed using a t-test, x2 test and multiple logistic regression. Results: A total of 13 486 individuals (6640 girls and 6846 boys) out of 14 880 invited participated in the study (response rate 90.6%). LS and good SRH showed linearly negative associations with smoking status in both sexes. The proportions of LS and SRH categories were significantly different among all subsets of smoking status. Those classified as 'nonsmokers' had the highest proportions of LS and good SRH, followed by 'only passive smokers' and 'only active smokers', while those with 'active and passive smoking' had the lowest proportions of LS and good SRH. In a multivariate model, students in the 'active and passive smoking' group had lower odds of LS (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57) and good SRH (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.68) than those in the 'non-smoker' group. Students in the 'only passive smoker' group also had lower odds of LS (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83) and good SRH (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80) compared with the 'non-smoker' group. Conclusions: Adolescents with different smoking habits and exposure patterns have poorer SRH and LS than non-smokers. Both active and passive smoking status could affect LS and SRH in adolescents. Therefore, smoking prevention strategies should be considered as a health priority in school health services for promoting psychological well-being in children and adolescents.