Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Serum Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein As Nosocomial Infection Markers in Hospitalized Patients Without Localizing Signs



Khorvash F1 ; Abdi F2 ; Dialami K3 ; Kooshki AM4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Infectious Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Medical Students Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Infection Diseases, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2011

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of infection with the use of valuable markers leads to decreased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for detecting nosocomial infection in hospitalized patients without localizing signs. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on 150 hospitalized patients with fever > 38°C emerging 48-72 hours after their admission at Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. The subjects did not have any localizing sign of infection. PCT and CRP values were determined using rapid tests and were compared with results of blood culture as the standard test. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PV) and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated for both PCT and CRP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the PCT and CRP for detecting nosocomial infections. Finally, the areas under the resulting curves were compared. RESULTS: PCT had a sensitivity of 57.1%, a specificity of 89.1%, a positive PV of 46.2%, and a negative PV of 92.7% while the corresponding percentages for CRP test were 76.2%, 48%, 19.3%, and 92.5%. PCT marker also had a higher positive LR and lower negative LR than did CRP marker. The observed areas under the ROC curves were 0.73 for CRP (95% CI, 0.63-0.82; p = 0.023) and 0.80 for PCT (95% CI, 0.68-0.91; p = 0.001). The optimal cut-off values (best diagnostic accuracy) were 39 mg/L for CRP and 7.5 ng/mL for PCT. CONCLUSIONS: Determination of PCT and CRP is a valuable tool for identifying nosocomial infections. PCT showed better specificity, negative and positive PV. However CRP showed significantly better sensitivity compared with PCT. Therefore, these tests should be considered as part of initial work-up for patients with unknown source of infection.
Other Related Docs
13. Assessment of a Urinary Antigen Test in Inpatients With Pneumococcal Pneumonia, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2012)
16. Procalcitonin: A Reliable Marker for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis, Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences (2012)