Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Fasting Glucose With Post-Load Glucose Values and Glycated Hemoglobin for Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes: The Isfahan Diabetes Prevention Study Publisher



Janghorbani M1, 2 ; Amini M2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Review of Diabetic Studies Published:2009


Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-load plasma glucose values and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) to predict progression to diabetes in non-diabetic first-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 701 non-diabetic FDR of diabetic patients aged 20-70 years surveyed in 2003 to 2005 were followed until 2008 for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. At baseline and at follow-ups, participants underwent a standard 75 g 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Prediction of progression to type 2 diabetes was assessed by using area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves based upon measurement of FPG, post-load glucose values and HbA1c. RESULTS: The incidence of type 2 diabetes was 33.9 per 1000 person-years in men and 48.6 in women. The incidence rates were 4.6, 50.7, and 99.7 per 1000 person-years in FDR with normal glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance respectively. FPG value was a better predictor of progression to diabetes than any postload glucose values or HbA1c. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.811 for fasting, 0.752 for 1/2-hour, 0.782 for 1-hour and 0.756 for 2-hour glucose vs. 0.634 for HbA1c (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FPG had more discriminatory power to distinguish between individuals at risk for diabetes and those who were not at risk than post-load glucose values during OGTT or HbA1c. Our findings support the American Diabetes Association recommendation of using FPG concentration to diagnose diabetes.
Other Related Docs
28. Risk of Diabetes in Combined Metabolic Abnormalities and Body Mass Index Categories, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2016)
41. Metabolic Syndrome in First Degree Relatives of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Incidence and Risk Factors, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2011)
44. Comparison of Different Obesity Indices for Predicting Incident Hypertension, High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Prevention (2017)