Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparison of X-Lets in Denoising Cdna Microarray Images Publisher



Shams R1 ; Rabbani H2 ; Gazor S3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Biomedical Engineering Department, Medical Image and Signal Processing Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan 81745319, Iran
  3. 3. Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

Source: ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings Published:2014


Abstract

Microarray technology has become a power tool in the field of bioinformatics. It is used to measure gene expression levels and similar to any other image capturing processes is prone to noise. There are different kinds of noise, during preparation, hybridization and scanning in microarray images which usually are modeled by Gaussian noise. Since introduction of wavelets in 1970s, many more forms and extensions of this transform have been developed and used, such as stationary wavelet transform (SWT), complex wavelet transform (CWT), curvelet transform (CURV) and contourlet transform (CNT). By developing of more sparse transforms, it is important to have a perspective of how efficient the transforms are in different applications, such as microarray image analysis. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of common sparse transforms including ordinary discrete wavelet transform (DWT), SWT, CWT, CURV, CNT, Contourlet-SD decomposition, steerable pyramid (STP) and shearlet transform (SHR) for microarray image denoising. Therefore after converting microarray image into x-let transform, BayesShrink method, soft and hard thresholding are used to perform denoising of these images. Both local and general thresholds are calculated for each subband in order to evaluate the effect of incorporating intrascale dependency on top of sparsity property in statistical modeling of x-let's coefficients. Our simulation results show that CWT and SHR outperforms the others when using global thresholding and SWT is the preferred transform when using local thresholding. Although STP and SHR have better performance for some criteria like structural similarity (SSIM) index, but CWT is faster. © 2014 IEEE.
Related Docs
1. Geometrical X-Lets for Image Denoising, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (2019)
5. Wavelet-Domain Medical Image Denoising Using Bivariate Laplacian Mixture Model, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2009)
Experts (# of related papers)