Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
In-Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Different Bonding Strategies on the Micro-Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin to Dentin Publisher



Samimi P1 ; Alizadeh V2, 3 ; Fathpour K1 ; Mazaheri H1 ; Mortazavi V4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dental Material Research Center and Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Graduate, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Torabinejad Dental Research Center and Department of Restorative Dentistry and Material Engineering, Biomaterial Research Group, University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Dental Research Journal Published:2016


Abstract

Background: The current study evaluated the micro-shear bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite resin to dentin. Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, 70 extracted premolars were assigned to one of seven groups (n = 10): Group 1: OptiBond Solo Plus (Opt; Kerr); Group 2: SE Bond (SE; Kuraray); Group 3: Silorane System Adhesive (SSA; 3M ESPE); Group 4: OptiBond Solo Plus + LS Bond (Opt LS); Group 5: SE Bond + LS Bond (SE LS); Group 6: OptiBond Solo Plus (Opt Po); and Group 7: SE Bond (SE Po). Occlusal dentin was exposed and restored with Filtek LS (3M ESPE) in groups 1 to 5 and Point 4 (Kerr) in groups 6 and 7. After thermocycling (1000 cycles at 5/55C), micro-shear bond test was carried out to measure the bond strengths. The results were submitted to analysis of variance and post hoc Tukeytests (P < 0.05). Results: Two-way ANOVA showed no significant differences between the two types of composite resin (P = 0.187), between bonding agents (P = 0.06) and between composite resin and bonding agents (P = 0.894). Because P value of bonding agents was near the significance level, one-way ANOVA was used separately between the two composite groups. This analysis showed significant differences between silorane composite resin groups (P = 0.045) and Tukey test showed a significant difference between Groups 4 and 5 (P = 0.03). Conclusion: The application of total-etch and self-etch methacrylate-based adhesives with and without use of a hydrophobic resin coating resulted in acceptable bond strengths. © 2016 Dental Research Journal.
Other Related Docs
37. Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Universal Adhesive Systems Treated With an Antioxidant, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2018)
40. Effect of Different Chemical Disinfectants on the Flexural Strength of Heat-Polymerized Acrylic Resins, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry (2013)