Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Convolutional Mixture of Experts Model: A Comparative Study on Automatic Macular Diagnosis in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Publisher



Rasti R1 ; Mehridehnavi A1 ; Rabbani H1 ; Hajizadeh F1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors Published:2019


Abstract

Background: Macular disorders, such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are among the major ocular diseases. Having one of these diseases can lead to vision impairments or even permanent blindness in a not-so-long time span. So, the early diagnosis of these diseases are the main goals for researchers in the field. Methods: This study is designed in order to present a comparative analysis on the recent convolutional mixture of experts (CMoE) models for distinguishing normal macular OCT from DME and AMD. For this purpose, we considered three recent CMoE models called Mixture ensemble of convolutional neural networks (ME-CNN), Multiscale Convolutional Mixture of Experts (MCME), and Wavelet-based Convolutional Mixture of Experts (WCME) models. For this research study, the models were evaluated on a database of three differen macular OCT sets. Two first OCT sets were acquired by Heidelberg imaging systems consisting of 148 and 45 subjects respectively and set3 was constituted of 384 Bioptigen OCT acquisitions. To provide better performance insight into the CMoE ensembles, we extensively analyzed the models based on the 5-fold cross-validation method and various classification measures such as precision and average area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Experimental evaluations showed that the MCME and WCME outperformed the ME-CNN model and presented overall precisions of 98.14% and 96.06% for aligned OCTs respectively. For non-aligned retinal OCTs, these values were 93.95% and 95.56%. Conclusion: Based on the comparative analysis, although the MCME model outperformed the other CMoE models in the analysis of aligned retinal OCTs, the WCME offers a robust model for diagnosis of non-aligned retinal OCTs. This allows having a fast and robust computer-aided system in macular OCT imaging which does not rely on the routine computerized processes such as denoising, segmentation of retina layers, and also retinal layers alignment. © 2019 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
12. Detection of Retinal Abnormalities in Oct Images Using Wavelet Scattering Network, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (2022)
17. Multivariate Statistical Modeling of Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2020)
28. Mixture of Symmetric Stable Distributions for Macular Pathology Detection in Optical Coherence Tomography Scans, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (2022)
30. Retinal Oct Image Denoising Based on Adaptive Bessel K-Form Modeling, 2023 30th National and 8th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, ICBME 2023 (2023)