Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Gender Differences in Risk Factors and Outcomes After Cardiac Rehabilitation Publisher Pubmed



Sarrafzadegan N1 ; Rabiei K2 ; Kabir A3 ; Sadeghi M4 ; Khosravi A5 ; Asgari S6 ; Taghipour HR7 ; Roohafza H8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Rehabilitation Department, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Practical Studies Department, Nikan Health Researchers Institute, Tehran, No. 1, 3rd Bahar St., Ashrafi Esfahani Exp way, Poonak Sq., Iran
  4. 4. Cardiovascular Disease in Women Unit, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Cardiology and High Risk Unit, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Pharmacognosy and Basic Research Department, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Isfahan, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Baqyiatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Mental Health Unit, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Acta Cardiologica Published:2008


Abstract

Objective - We compared the baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes between men and women in an Iranian cardiac rehabilitation programme after adjusting for age, body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio. Methods - In a self-controlled descriptive study performed between 1996 and 2006, we evaluated 547 patients with documented coronary heart disease before and after a 24-session cardiac rehabilitation programme. Results - Women were older, more likely to be obese, anxious, depressed, and had more traditional coronary heart disease risk factors than men. At baseline, exercise capacity was lower (P < 0.001), but total cholesterol (P < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.007), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.00 1), fasting blood sugar (P = 0.002), left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (P < 0.00 1), diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.00 1), and heart rate (P = 0.016) were higher in women. Although there was significant improvement in most of the variables and risk factors after cardiac rehabilitation, changes were not statistically significant between men and women except for significantly more improvement in exercise capacity (P < 0.001) and less reduction in body mass index (P = 0.04) in men. Conclusion - Following a short-term cardiac rehabilitation programme, modification in cardiac risk factors and quality of life occurs. Both genders benefit alike in most aspects from this programme.
Other Related Docs
19. Global Availability of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Nature Reviews Cardiology (2014)
34. Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Lipid Profile, Journal of Association of Physicians of India (2003)