Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Intracranial Aneurysms: Review of Current Treatment Options and Outcomes Publisher



Seibert B1 ; Tummala RP2, 3 ; Chow R3, 4 ; Faridar A3 ; Mousavi SA5 ; Divani AA2, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  2. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  3. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  4. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  5. 5. Department of Neurology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Frontiers in Neurology Published:2011


Abstract

Intracranial aneurysms are present in roughly 5% of the population, yet most are often asymptomatic and never detected. Development of an aneurysm typically occurs during adulthood, while formation and growth are associated with risk factors such as age, hyper-tension, pre-existing familial conditions, and smoking. Subarachnoid hemorrhage, the most common presentation due to aneurysm rupture, represents a serious medical condition often leading to severe neurological deficit or death. Recent technological advances in imag-ing modalities, along with increased understanding of natural history and prevalence of aneurysms, have increased detection of asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). Studies reporting on the risk of rupture and outcomes have provided much insight, but the debate remains of how and when unruptured aneurysms should be managed. Treatment methods include two major intervention options: clipping of the aneurysm and endovascular methods such as coiling, stent-assisted coiling, and flow diversion stents. The studies reviewed here support the generalized notion that endovascular treatment of UIA provides a safe and effective alternative to surgical treatment.The risks associated with endovascular repair are lower and incur shorter hospital stays for appropriately selected patients. The endovascular treatment option should be considered based on factors such as aneurysm size, location, patient medical history, and operator experience. © 2011 Seibert, Tummala, Chow, Faridar, Mousavi and Divani.