Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Quality Assessment of Persian Mental Disorders Websites Using the Webmedqual Scale Publisher



Shahrzadi L1 ; Mojiri S1 ; Janatian S2 ; Taheri B3 ; Ashrafirizi H1 ; Shahrzadi Z4 ; Zahedi R5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Medical Library and Information Science, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Faculty of Psychology and Education, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Information Systems Managements, Foolad Institute of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Acta Informatica Medica Published:2014


Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, anyone with any level of Internet knowledge can act as producer and distributor of information. It differs from most traditional media of information transmission, lack of information control and lack of quality management to contents. This leads to quality of health information on the internet is doubtful. The object of this study is guidance patients to select valid mental disorders and determine the quality of Persian mental disorders websites. Methods: The sample of this study comprised 29 Persian mental disorders websites that were chosen by searching the Google, Yahoo and AltaVista search engines for the Persian equivalents of the three concepts depression, anxiety, and obsession. website was created by individuals or organizations. Data collection was performed with the WebMedQual checklist. Websites was assessed based on indicators as content, authority of source, design, accessibility and availability, links, user support, and confidentiality and privacy (Maximum score for any website was 83, mean score 41.5 and minimum score was 0). Collected data analyzed by one sample T- test in SPSS 20. Findings presented by Mean score and optimal score. Results: Based on the WebMedQual scale the mean score of Persian mental disorders websites in sex constructs including content (7.02±2.10), authority of source (4.71±1.96),accessibility and availability (2.19±0.47), links (1.45±0.97), user support (4.28±1.33), andconfidentiality and privacy (2.81±2.81) are poor and below average, but the score for the design (9.17± 1.59) is above average. The best website of mental disorders was that of the IranianPsychological Association. Conclusions: According to the results, only one website obtained the average score, so the quality of Persian mental disorders websites is low. Therefore, it is essential for users to criticize websites' content and not trust them before evaluating them. It is better to use the ranked list websites or search on the internet by help information experts. © AVICENA 2014.
Other Related Docs
12. A Review of Mental Health Indicators in National Studies, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2018)
14. Evaluation Criteria for Health Websites: Critical Review, Frontiers in Health Informatics (2020)
15. The Webometric Status of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2013)
25. The Efficiency of Mental Health Integration in Primary Health Care: A Ten-Year Study, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2012)