Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparative Study of Interagency Communications and Information Exchange in Disaster Response Among Selected Countries Publisher



Abdolahzadeh F1 ; Bagherian H2 ; Peyravi M3 ; Kolivand P4 ; Tavakoli N5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Faculty of Medical Information Sciences and Management, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Health Economics, Medical School, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Health Management and Economics, Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Education and Health Promotion Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Effective communications and secure information exchange platforms during disasters and emergencies are among the significant factors in inclusive disaster management and can radically contribute to better preparedness, efficient and timely responsiveness, and, finally, maximal reduction of damages and fatalities. The present study was to compare communications and information exchange among disaster response organizations in selected countries. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This applied research, carried out in 2022, was a qualitative descriptive-comparative study pursuing a content analysis approach. Australia, Turkey, India, America, Japan, and Iran constituted the statistical population of the study. The sampling was based on the countries' disaster histories and response experiences. The note-taking tool was used to extract and collect data during the review of texts, documents, and articles, and the qualitative content analysis method was employed for data analysis. Results: The outcomes of the descriptive-comparative analysis fell into four main comparative axes of the selected countries, including comparing reference, authority, and coordinator organizations in the response phase, comparing planning records and histories in disaster and emergency management comparing the contribution or non-contribution of government, military institutions, and non-governmental organizations to disaster and emergency management, the commonalities of the selected countries' disaster and emergency management and dependence on government. Conclusion: The results revealed that all selected countries depended on the government in managing disasters and emergencies, and the four communication platforms, i.e., landline telephone, mobile phone, radio communications systems, and couriers, were the common communication and information acquisition sources. © 2023 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.
Other Related Docs
10. Health Sector’S Flood Response Plan: A Comprehensive Review, Environmental Health Engineering and Management (2021)
13. Community-Based Disaster Preparedness; a Training Program Based on Needs Assessment, Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly (2025)
19. Review Paper: Crisis Management at Iranian Schools: A Review Study, Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly (2020)
25. Disaster Health Literacy for Diabetics: A Scoping Review Towards a Framework, Journal of Education and Health Promotion (2024)
29. An Operational Exercise for Disaster Assessment and Emergency Preparedness in South of Iran, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (2020)
35. Reforming the Incident Management System in the Health System: A Perspective Article, Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly (2023)