Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Relation Between Ankle-Brachial Index (Abi) and Coronary Artery Disease Severity and Risk Factors: An Angiographic Study



Sadeghi M1 ; Heidari R2, 3 ; Mostanfar B2, 3 ; Tavassoli A1 ; Roghani F2, 3 ; Yazdekhasti S4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: ARYA Atherosclerosis Published:2011

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study aims to determine the relation between ankle-brachial index (ABI) and angiographic findings and major cardiovascular risk factors in patients with suspected coronary artery diseases (CAD) in Isfahan. METHODS: In this cross-sectional descriptive-analytic research, patients with suspected CAD were studied. Characteristics of studied subjects including demographics, familial history, past medical history and atherosclerotic risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking were obtained using a standard questionnaire. ABI was measured in all studied patients. ABI ≤ 0.9 (ABI+) was considered as peripheral vessel disease and ABI > 0.9 (ABI-) was considered as normal. Then, all studied patients underwent coronary artery angiography. The results of the questionnaire and angiographic findings were compared in ABI+ and ABI- groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS 15 using ANOVA, t-test, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and discriminant analysis. RESULTS: In this study, 125 patients were investigated. ABI ≤ 0.9 was seen in 25 patients (20%). The prevalence of ABI+ among men and women was 25.9% and 7.5%, respectively (P = 0.01). The prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors was significantly higher in ABI+ patients than in ABIones (P < 0.05). ABI+ patients had more significant stenosis than ABI- ones. The mean of occlusion was significantly higher in ABI+ patients with left main artery (LMA), right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD), diagonal artery 1 (D1) and left circumflex artery (LCX) involvements (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this research indicated that ABI could be a useful method in assessing both the atherosclerotic risk factors and the degree of coronary involvements in suspected patients. However, in order to make more accurate decisions for using this method in diagnosing and preventing CAD, we should plan further studies in large sample sizes of general population.
Other Related Docs
9. Uric Acid: A Risk Factor for Coronary Atherosclerosis?, Cardiovascular Journal of South Africa (2007)
14. Is Subcutaneous Fat Tissue Associated With Coronary Artery Disease?, Iranian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (2012)
22. Trend of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors in Children of Isfahan, Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals (2001)
26. Is Lp(A), As Predictor of Severity of Coronary Artery Disease?, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2009)
50. Association of Wrist Circumference With Cardio Metabolic Risk Factors., JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association (2012)