Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Retinal Arterial Occlusion and Patent Foramen Ovale: A Case Study-Based Review; [Occlusion Arterielle Retinienne Et Foramen Ovale Permeable: Examen Base Sur Des Etudes De Cas] Publisher Pubmed



Fekri S1, 2 ; Mahmoudimehr P3 ; Jafari Fesharaki M4 ; Hosseinjani E4 ; Abtahi SH1, 2 ; Nouri H1, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Ophthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Cardiology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie Published:2024


Abstract

Purpose: To identify all reported cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the literature and present a similar case of CRAO from our clinic. Methods: PubMed database was searched for studies reporting RAO in individuals with PFO. Relevant data were tabulated and reviewed. We estimated each case's Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score. Results: 23 cases of CRAO (n = 10; including ours), BRAO (n = 10), and CILRAO (n = 3) were reviewed. Most cases were under 50 years of age (78.3%). The reported predisposing factors were: hypertension (26.1%), migraine (17.3%), smoking (13.0%), recent immobilization (13.0%), strenuous exertion (8.7%), pregnancy (8.7%), and diabetes (4.3%). A high RoPE score (≥7; suggestive of paradoxical embolism via PFO) was estimated for 71.4% of patients. In most cases, the neurological and cardiovascular examinations, laboratory studies, and imaging were unremarkable, except for the PFO ± atrial septal aneurysm (present in 21.7%). In only 28.6% of cases, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (± saline contrast) could visualize the PFO; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was necessary to detect the PFO in 71.4%. Approximately one-half of the patients underwent percutaneous closure of the PFO; no complications or subsequent acute ischemic events ensued. The visual prognosis was poorer for CRAO than for BRAO or CILRAO. Conclusion: Timely diagnosis, acute management, and ensuring urgent initiation of stroke workup in cases with RAO or transient monocular vision loss are crucial. Clues to a possible paradoxical embolism as the cause include the absence of known cardiovascular risk factors, young age, migraine, recent immobility, vigorous exercise, and pregnancy. © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)