Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients With Diabetes: An Investigation Study Using a Willingness-To-Pay Method Publisher



Moradi N1 ; Rashidian A2 ; Nosratnejad S3 ; Olyaeemanesh A4, 5 ; Zanganeh M6 ; Zarei L7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Health Economics, Iranian Centre of Excellence in Health Service Management, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  4. 4. Health Economics Department, National Institute for Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Health Equity Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Head of Health Insurance Office, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: PharmacoEconomics - Open Published:2019


Abstract

Background: A limited number of studies have specifically examined the value of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the patient’s perspective. Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the worth of QALYs from the perspectives of patients with diabetes using health and willingness-to-pay (WTP) measures. Methods: A hypothetical treatment characterized by a permanent cure was presented to 149 patients with diabetes in Tehran, Iran, to elicit the monetary value that they attach to QALYs. The QALY gains of the participants were determined using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, 3 Levels instrument, the visual analogue scale, and the time trade-off method. A mixed closed-ended WTP model supported by an open-ended question was used to ascertain the monetary value of a QALY gained. Finally, we used each respondent’s ratio of WTP to QALY gained and the mean of the ratios to estimate the worth of a QALY to all respondents. Results: In total, 96% of respondents were willing to pay out of pocket for the restoration of full health, whereas 4% exhibited a zero WTP because of an inability to pay. The mean WTP per QALY varied depending on the health measure and discount rate used, ranging from $US1191 to $US5043 in sensitivity analysis, which is equal to 0.23–0.95 of Iran’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in 2015. Conclusion: Applying the upper limit of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) cost-effectiveness threshold (i.e., three times the local GDP per capita) in resource allocation decisions requires caution and investigation, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with limited healthcare resources. To generalize our findings, especially for application to decision making, additional surveys involving more representative samples from different settings are recommended. © 2019, The Author(s).