Inguinal Hernia: Lichtenstein Vs Shouldice Technique Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial Publisher



Ahmadinejad I¹ ; Jalali A² ; Ahmadinejad M³ ; Soltanian A³ ; Ahamdinejad Y⁴ ; Shirzadi A³ ; Chaghamirzayi P²
Source: Surgery Open Science Published:2024

Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequent operation in general surgery. The chance of a person having to undergo an inguinal hernia operation during his/her life is quite high, 27 % in men and 3 % in women. European Hernia Society guidelines state that the Lichtenstein technique (mesh-based repair) is the standard treatment of elective inguinal hernia in adults. Some authors consider the Shouldice technique (tissue-based repair) the best conventional method for open hernia repair. In this study, we compared these two methods. Methods: In This randomized study, 452 patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups. 51 patients were lost during follow-up period and were excluded from further analysis in the study. Finally, the analyzed patients were 183 patients in Shouldice technique group and 218 patients in Lichtenstein technique group. All patients were examined after 1 week, 1, 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after the operation date. Results: After 3 years follow up Recurrence of hernia in Shouldice technique group was 7.1 % and in Lichtenstein technique group was 3 % with significant differences (p-value 0.006). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in wound infection, Seroma, hematoma, Hydrocele, Bladder damage, chronic pain in the inguinal region, and Patient Satisfaction level after surgery. Conclusion: It seems that inguinal hernia treatment by the Lichtenstein technique is better than the Shouldice technique in elective patients. © 2024 The Author(s)