Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Towards Developing a Model for the Evaluation of Hospital Disaster Resilience: A Systematic Review Publisher Pubmed



Fallahaliabadi S1 ; Ostadtaghizadeh A1 ; Ardalan A1, 2 ; Fatemi F3 ; Khazai B4 ; Mirjalili MR5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
  3. 3. Research Center for Health Services and Technologies, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  4. 4. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
  5. 5. Civil Engineering Department, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Source: BMC Health Services Research Published:2020


Abstract

Background: Hospitals play a vital role in disaster stricken regions. The resilient hospitals will be able to provide essential services to affected people and it can mitigate the risk of injuries during and after disasters. This study aimed to obtain the indicators required for the evaluation of hospital resilience. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in 2018. Through this systematic review, international electronic databases were investigated for the research studies published in English. The exclusion and inclusion criteria were determined to extract the hospital resilience indicators. These indicators will be used in order to develop a model to keep the system performance at an acceptable level during disasters. Results: Out of 1794 research studies published until September 2018, 89 articles and guidelines with full text were surveyed. Thirty-two articles and guidelines were then selected and analyzed to collect the indicators related to hospital disaster resilience (HDR). The domains and the indicators were extracted from these selected research studies. The authors collected and categorized them into three domains and twenty seven subdomains. The three domains included constructive, infrastructural, and administrative resilience. The relevant indicators were designed for each subdomain to assess HDR. Conclusion: Since diverse indicators affect hospital resilience, other studies should be conducted to propose some models or tools to quantify the hospital resilience in different countries and scopes with an all hazards approach. © 2020 The Author(s).